Legal Opinion
Lin v. City of Pleasanton
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 2009No. A121147PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEEDHAM, J.
Defendant the City of Pleasanton enacted an ordinance approving a proposed 51-unit residential development on land owned by plaintiffs Jennifer and Frederic Lin. Real party in interest Kay Ayala, a former city councilperson and member of an unincorporated association operating under the name “Save Pleasanton’s Hills,” gathered the number of voter signatures necessary to hold a referendum on the ordinance. (Elec. Code, § 9236, subd. (b).) The superior court granted the Lins’ petition for a writ of mandate directing the city clerk to refrain from certifying the referendum…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Soukup v. Law Offices of Herbert HafifCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Barry v. State Bar of Cal.California Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Colton v. SingletaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Martin v. Inland Empire Utilities AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. Amador Water Agency, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.