Legal Opinion
Brown v. Electronic Arts, Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided July 13, 2010No. Case CV 09-01598 DMG (RZx)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S (1) MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES INCURRED IN CONNECTION WITH ANTI-SLAPP MOTION; AND (2) MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES INCURRED IN CONNECTION WITH LANHAM ACT CLAIM [50, 51]
DOLLY M. GEE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motions for Attorneys’ Fees incurred in bringing its initial anti-SLAPP motion and in litigating Plaintiffs Lanham Act claim. The Court deems this matter appropriate for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78(b); C.D. Cal. L.R. 7-15. For the reasons set forth below, both Motions for Attorneys’ Fees are DENIED.
I
PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Vess v. Ciba-Geigy Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Gardner v. MartinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Gracie v. GracieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Stephen W. Boney, Inc. v. Boney Services, Inc., Stephen W. Boney, Inc. v. Boney Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Mann v. Quality Old Time Service, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Sierra Media, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2013
- Atari Interactive, Inc. v. Hyperkin Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2020
- Daniel Alvarez v. Los Angeles County et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2025
- Henne v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Michael Henne v. City Of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.