Barry v. State Bar of Cal.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtKruger, J.
*320 Under California's anti-SLAPP statute, a defendant may bring a special motion to strike a cause of action arising from constitutionally protected speech or petitioning activity. (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16, subd. (b)(1).) Unless the plaintiff establishes a probability of prevailing on the claim, the court must grant the motion and ordinarily must also award the defendant its attorney's fees and costs. ( Id. , subds. (b)(1) & (c)(1).) In this case, the trial court ruled that plaintiff had failed to show a probability of prevailing because, among other reasons, the court lacked subject matter…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Willy v. Coastal Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Filmon.Com. Inc. v. Doubleverify Inc.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Rand Resources, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Area 51 Prods., Inc. v. City of Alameda, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Mission Beverage Co. v. Pabst Brewing Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Ramachandran v. City of L. AltosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.