Legal Opinion

Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. Amador Water Agency

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 14, 2019No. C082079PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

*174*283Citizens submitted a referendum petition to challenge Amador Water Agency's Board Resolution No. 2015-19, adopting new water service rates for Agency customers. ( Cal. Const., art. II, § 9 [voters have referendum power to approve or reject state statutes except, e.g., tax levies]; Cal. Const., art. II, § 11 [referendum power may be exercised by city and county electors under procedures provided by Legislature]; Water Code App., § 95-3.8 [water agency has power to fix and collect rates and charges for its services];

*284Water Code App., § 95-7.3 [water agency electors have initiative and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. GuardinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Sangster v. PaetkauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Simpson v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. California Cannabis Coalition v. City of UplandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Rossi v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wilde v. City of DunsmuirCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Woolard v. ThurmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API