Legal Opinion
Johnson v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 2006No. A111355PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, Acting P. J.
Appellants Scott Johnson and Small Property Owners of San Francisco, Inc. (SPOSF), appeal a judgment in favor of respondents City and County of San Francisco and City and County of San Francisco Board of Supervisors (collectively, the City) after the trial court denied appellants’ petition for writ of mandate, concluding that a notice requirement in the City’s rental ordinance was not preempted by the Ellis Act (or Act) (Gov. Code, 1 § 7060 et seq.). We reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The San Francisco Administrative Code requires landlords who seek…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Nash v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- L.A Lincoln Place Invr's, LTD. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- City of Santa Monica v. YarmarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Javidzad v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Colony Cove Properties, LLC v. City of CarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Sacks v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Coyne v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- San Francisco Apartment Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- City of W. Hollywood v. Kihagi, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.