Legal Opinion

Sacks v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 10, 2010No. A126781; No. A126817PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DONDERO, J.

Following a bench trial, a judgment was entered that granted in part and denied in part the petition for writ of mandate filed by Marleen Sacks (petitioner or Sacks), in which she contested the allocation and use of tax revenue collected by the City of Oakland (respondent or the City) pursuant to Measure Y, an ordinance enacted by the voters to add neighborhood beat officers to the police department, among other purposes. The City has filed an appeal from part of the judgment that declared impermissible the use of Measure Y funds to hire and train new officers to replace…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Horwich v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Mejia v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wasatch Property Management v. DegrateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mt. Hawley Insurance v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Salt Lake City Corp. v. Jordan River Restoration NetworkUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Outfitter Properties, LLC v. Wildlife Conservation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. City of San Diego v. HaasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  5. People v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API