Legal Opinion
Nash v. City of Santa Monica
California Supreme Court
Decided October 25, 1984No. L.A. 31798PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRODIN, J.
In this case we are called upon to determine the validity of Santa Monica City Charter section 1803, subdivision (t)—which prohibits removal of rental units from the housing market by conversion or demolition absent a removal permit from the Santa Monica Rent Control Board—as it applies to prevent the owner of an apartment building from evicting his tenants and tearing the building down. The trial court held that the ordinance, as so applied, constitutes a deprivation of property without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Terminal Plaza Corp. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- Daro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Pennell v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.