City of W. Hollywood v. Kihagi
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
*743Anne Kihagi, 1263 North Crescent, LLC, and Aquat 009, LLC (collectively Kihagi) appeals the trial court judgment in favor of City of West Hollywood (City) finding that Kihagi violated her settlement agreement with the City and permanently enjoining her from terminating tenancies at 1263-1267-1/2 North Crescent Heights Boulevard in West Hollywood. The trial court also awarded attorney fees to the City. We affirm the trial court's determination that Kihagi violated the settlement agreement. However, because the permanent injunction in its current state is unenforceable, we reverse the trial…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Chia-Lee Hsu v. AbbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Weddington Productions, Inc. v. FlickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Nash v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coyne v. De Leo, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Coyne v. De LeoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Louie v. Pier 39 Limited PartnershipDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2022
- Maarten v. CohanzadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- Park Lane Associates, LP v. Alioto CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.