Legal Opinion
San Francisco Apartment Ass'n v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 19, 2016No. A144702PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JENKINS, J.—
This is an appeal from the trial court’s grant of a writ of mandate and injunctive relief in favor of plaintiffs San Francisco Apartment Association (SFAA), Coalition for Better Housing (CBH), and San Francisco Association of Realtors (SFAR) (collectively, plaintiffs). Plaintiffs sought this relief against defendant City and County of San Francisco (City/County) on preemption grounds, asserting that a local ordinance, San Francisco Planning Code, 1 article 3, former section 317, subdivision (e)(4) (hereinafter, former section 317(e)(4) or Ordinance), absolutely conflicted…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- People v. DavenportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Soon Hing v. CrowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Citizens for Amending Proposition v. City of Pomona, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- T-Mobile West LLC v. City and County of S.F.California Supreme Court · 2019
- Coyne v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Small Prop. Owners of S.F. Inst. v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.