Legal Opinion

Javidzad v. City of Santa Monica

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 12, 1988No. B031270PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

Defendants and appellants the City of Santa Monica (City), the Santa Monica Rent Control Board (Board), and William Rome (Rome) (collectively, appellants), appeal a judgment granting a petition for peremptory writ of mandate. The judgment directed the City and the Board to process an application by plaintiffs and respondents Fariborz Javidzad, Faramarz Javidzad, and Moussa Javidzad (collectively, the Javidzads) for a demolition permit without requiring the Javidzads first to obtain from the Board a removal permit authorizing the permanent removal of the property from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nash v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Santa Monica v. YarmarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Daro v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. L.A Lincoln Place Invr's, LTD. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. Apartment Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API