Legal Opinion
Coyne v. City and County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 21, 2017No. A145044, A146569PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
—In this consolidated appeal, we consider limits on mitigation measures a municipality may impose on landlords under the Ellis Act, when a landlord seeks to remove residential property from the rental market. The City and County of San Francisco (the City) appeals two superior court judgments invalidating City-enacted ordinances increasing the relocation assistance payments property owners owe their tenants under the Ellis Act. (Gov. Code, § 7060 et seq.) The superior court found both ordinances facially preempted by the act. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Tobe v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Big Creek Lumber Co. v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of W. Hollywood v. Kihagi, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- S.F. Apartment Ass'n v. City & Cnty. of S.F., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- City of West Hollywood v. KihagiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Covert v. FCA USACalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.