Legal Opinion

Barr v. Carroll

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1954No. Civ. 16033PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Defendant’s appeal from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff presents only one question: in view of the allegations of the original and first amended complaints, alleging guest status of plaintiff in defendant’s automobile and wilful misconduct of defendant, did the first count in the second amended complaint alleging involuntary passenger status of plaintiff and negligence of defendant, set up a new and different cause of action?

Record *

The first count of the original complaint (filed December 3, 1947), alleged that on May 8, 1947, plaintiff was riding as an invited…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Universal Concrete Pipe Co. v. BassettOhio Supreme Court · 1936

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dubay v. IrishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  2. Grudt v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Weinstock v. EisslerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Smith v. Los Angeles Bookbinders Union No. 63California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Shelton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API