Legal Opinion
Shelton v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 8, 1976No. Civ. 37400PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
Petitioners, husband and wife, who originally filed their joint complaint in respondent court seeking individually general and special damages proximately resulting from injuries suffered as a result of an automobile accident on March 6, 1973, now seek a peremptory writ of mandate ordering the trial court, which has denied their motion to that end, to permit them to amend their complaint to include, with respect to each, an amendment to claim damages for loss of consortium. (See Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp. (1974) 12 Cal.3d 382, 408 [115 Cal.Rptr. 765, 525 P.2d 669].)…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- City of San Jose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Vesely v. SagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Rodriguez v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Quiroz v. Seventh Avenue CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Loehr v. Ventura County Community College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Nelson v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.