Legal Opinion

Smith v. Los Angeles Bookbinders Union No. 63

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 8, 1955No. Civ. 20698PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ASHBURN, J. pro tem. *

Action for libel. Plaintiffs appeal from judgment for defendants entered after demurrer to amended complaint sustained without leave to amend; they also appeal from an order relieving defendants from default in demurring or answering to the amended complaint.

The appeal from the judgment presents the question whether the amended complaint brought into the case a new cause of action after the statute of limitation had run upon it. And the debate revolves around the matter of pleading special damage. Plaintiffs argue that the alleged defamatory matter is a libel per se and…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Wennerholm v. Stanford University School of MedicineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Imperial Ice Co. v. RossierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Harriss v. TamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1932

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. Tribune Publishing Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Williams v. the Daily Review, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1965
  3. Youngblood v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Fasuyi v. Permatex, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. Reynolds v. LermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API