Legal Opinion

United States v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided December 31, 1970No. Civ. A. 13319PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ITT — GRINNELL MERGER

Page QUESTION PRESENTED ................... 22

JURISDICTION ............................ 22

PRIOR PROCEEDINGS ..................... 22

PARTIES TO THE ACTION .................. 23

I. CLAIM THAT GRINNELL IS THE DOMINANT COMPETITOR IN CERTAIN LINES OF COMMERCE AND IN CERTAIN SECTIONS OF THE COUNTRY ........... 24

(A) LINES OF COMMERCE ............. 24(1) Automatic Sprinkler Devices ...... 24(2) Automatic Sprinkler Systems ..... 24(3) Power Piping .................. 24(4) Pipe Hangers .................. 25

(B) SECTIONS OF THE COUNTRY....... 25(1) Entire United States: For All Lines…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. United States v. Continental Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc. v. Piper Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1972
  3. Heyman v. KlineDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1970
  4. Dunlop Tire and Rubber Corporation v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Connecticut National BankDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API