United States v. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
On September 24, 1971, a final judgment was entered in this ease with the consent of the parties. Now Ralph Nader and Reuben B. Robertson, III, hitherto amici curiae, have moved to intervene in the instant case for the limited purpose of moving the court to set that judgment aside on the ground that it was obtained by “fraud . . . , misrepresentation, or other misconduct of an adverse party.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) (3).
I
Prior Proceedings
The prior proceedings in the instant case have been complex and extensive. Although the only judgment which the…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Martha Ann Brundage Rozier v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Salim Aoude v. Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- In Re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Antibiotic Antitrust Actions. Pfizer, Inc. v. International Rectifier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Valerio v. Boise Cascade Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,481 Hilda Herbst v. International Telephone and Telegraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.