Legal Opinion
Dunlop Tire and Rubber Corporation v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided June 5, 1973No. 626, Docket 72-2296PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Circuit Judge.
The essential issue on this appeal involves the application of the standard inventory exclusion clause in a fidelity insurance policy and bond to a claim for loss of property alleged to have been sustained by reason of fraudulent or dishonest acts of an unidentified employee of the insured.
Plaintiff Dunlop Tire and Rubber Corporation (Dunlop) brought this action in the New York Supreme Court, Erie County, in June 1970 to recover under a fidelity policy and bond issued by defendant Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (Fidelity). The complaint alleged that a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Meyer Jewelry Co. v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Tri-Motors Sales, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- The Gillette Company v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
- Hoboken Camera Ctr., Inc. v. HARTFORD ACC. & IND.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Locke Distributing Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- NY Univ. v. CONT'L INS CONew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Betco Scaffolds Co. v. Houston United Casualty Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- McCormick & Company, Inc. v. Empire Insurance Group, Allcity Insurance Company, Empire Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- HCA, Inc. v. American Protection Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Popeo v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.