Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Procter & Gamble Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 22, 1967No. 342PublishedCited by 194 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

This is a proceeding initiated by the Federal Trade Commission charging that respondent, Procter & Gamble Co., had acquired the assets of Clorox Chemical Co. in violation of § 7 of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731, as amended by the Celler-Kefauver Act, 64 Stat. 1125, *57015 U. S. C. § 18.1 The charge was that Procter’s acquisition of Clorox might substantially lessen competition or tend to create a monopoly in the production and sale of household liquid bleaches.

Following evidentiary hearings, the hearing examiner rendered his decision in which he concluded that the acquisition was unlawful and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. The Procter & Gamble Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by194 opinions

  1. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API