Legal Opinion

United States v. Continental Can Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 22, 1964No. 367PublishedCited by 208 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice White

In 1956, Continental Can Company, the Nation’s second largest producer of metal containers, acquired all of the assets, business and good will of Hazel-Atlas Glass Company, the Nation’s third largest producer of glass containers, in exchange for 999,140 shares of Continental’s common stock and the assumption by Continental of all the liabilities of Hazel-Atlas. The Government brought this action seeking a judgment that the acquisition violated § 7 of the Clayton Act1 and requesting an *444appropriate divestiture order. Trying the case without a jury, the District Court found that the Government…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by208 opinions

  1. Forsyth v. Humana, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Sullivan v. DB Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Woods Exploration & Producing Company, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. United States v. General Dynamics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API