Legal Opinion
Krevis v. City of Bridgeport
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 9, 2003No. AC 19438PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*433 Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
This appeal appears before this court after remand from the Supreme Court. The sole issue is whether the trial court properly granted the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant, the city of Bridgeport.
The background facts have been set forth in Krevis v. Bridgeport, 64 Conn. App. 176, 177-79, 779 A.2d 838 (2001), rev’d, 262 Conn. 813, 817 A.2d 628 (2003). The facts relevant to this appeal are as follows. After jury selection but prior to trial, the court heard oral argument on the defendant’s motion in limine to exclude evidence relating to punitive damages.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Williams v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Spears v. GarciaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Stokes v. LyddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Krevis v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Florian v. LengeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Gilbert v. Beaver Dam Ass'n of Stratford, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. MachadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Gold v. TOWN OF EAST HADDAMSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Cogan v. Chase Manhattan Auto Financial Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.