Legal Opinion
Florian v. Lenge
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 13, 2005No. AC 25064PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The pro se defendant, Frank Lenge, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, David W. Florian, Sr., in this action on a promissory note. The defendant claims that the court improperly (1) applied the law governing promissory notes under the Uniform Commercial Code rather than contract law, (2) held that the defense of laches was unavailable to him, (3) awarded attorney’s fees and (4) restricted cross-examination at trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to our…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Aspiazu v. OrgeraSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Amore v. FrankelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Smith v. SnyderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Bellemare v. Wachovia Mortgage Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Rudder v. MAMANASCO LAKE PARK ASS'N, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- Kosiorek v. SmigelskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Fileccia v. Nationwide Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.