Legal Opinion

Krevis v. City of Bridgeport

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 25, 2003No. SC 16624PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

VERTEFEUILLE, J.

In this certified appeal, the defendant, the city of Bridgeport, appeals from the Appellate Court’s reversal of the summary judgments rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant based on the parties’ submission to the court of a dispositive question of law. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the Appellate Court correctly concluded that it was procedurally improper for the trial court to consider and decide what the defendant termed an “oral motion for summary judgment” because of the defendant’s failure to comply with the procedural requirements for a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  2. State v. SiminoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  2. Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  3. Rosato v. MascardoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  4. Grimm v. FoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  5. Mamudovski v. BIC Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API