Legal Opinion

Warren Brothers Co. v. Boyle

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1919No. Civ. No. 2870PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Geo. A. Sturtevant, Judge. Reversed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.

Plaintiff sought a writ of mandate to compel the defendant to allow certain claims alleged to be due for material furnished the city and county of Sa.n Francisco, and used in the improvement of Mission Street, a duly accepted public street in said city. The trial court denied the petition and this appeal, taken upon the judgment-roll, is from that judgment. The findings of fact, together with the allegations of the pleadings, not denied, constitute the record for the purposes of this appeal.

The board of public works of the city and county of San Francisco recommended to the board of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Contra Costa Water Co. v. BreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Nicolson Pavement Co. v. PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Miller v. BoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Los Angeles Warehouse Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Braun, Bryant & Austin v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API