Miller v. Boyle
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to compel the auditor of the City and County of San Francisco to approve a claim and demand for services as architect. [Writ issued. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, P. J.
This is an application by the petitioner, who is a duly licensed, certified, and authorized architect, for an alternative writ, to be directed to the defendant as auditor of the city and county of San Francisco, requiring him to approve a claim and demand of petitioner for the sum of $1,205.66, alleged to be due as fees for services as architect, rendered the city and county. The claim was properly presented and duly allowed and approved, until it reached the defendant, who declined to audit the same, upon the ground that the petitioner herein was not employed in accordance with the civil…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spalding County v. Chamberlin & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- City of Houston v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
- Stratton v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Harris v. GibbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- City of Newport News v. PotterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Los Angeles Dredging Co. v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Kennedy v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Louisiana v. McIlhennySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.