Legal Opinion
Braun, Bryant & Austin v. McGuire
California Supreme Court
Decided April 26, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 9457PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondents, as members of and constituting the board of public works of the city of Los Angeles, to execute a contract for the improvement of certain streets and to pass upon the form and sufficiency of the bonds required in connection with said contract.
On the fourth day of September, 1925, the city council commenced proceedings to improve Orlando and other streets, electing to proceed under the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730). The requirements of the statute were complied with and the petitioner was…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Adams v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Heaton-Peninsular Button-Fastener Co. v. Eureka Specialty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Mayor of Baltimore v. FlackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1906
- Dean v. CharltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1869
- Nicolson Pavement Co. v. PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. City of TulareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Mefford v. City of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- The Gamewell Company, a Corporation v. The City of Phoenix, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Brydon v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.