Zottman v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Fourth Judicial District. The facts of the case are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtField., C. J.
In May, 1854, the city of San Francisco, then a municipal cor*99poration, entered into a contract with Hutting and Zottman for the improvement of certain public grounds of the city, known as Portsmouth Square, in accordance with certain plans and specifications, the work to be performed by the contractors under the supervision of a Superintendent to be selected by the Common Council of the city, and to be completed to the satisfaction of a Special Committee to be appointed by the Common Council, by the twelfth of September, following. A portion of the work designated in the contract consisted in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Argenti v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- Smith v. . BradyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- McCracken v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
- San Francisco Gas Co. v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- New-York Firemen Insurance Co. v. ElySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1825
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by155 opinions
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Chippewa Bridge Co. v. City of DurandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- United States v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
150 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.