Contra Costa Water Co. v. Breed
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus, instituted in the superior court to obtain a writ of mandate compelling the defendant, as auditor of the city of Oakland, to audit and draw his warrant for certain claims of plaintiff against said city. A demurrer to the complaint was overruled; and after answer by defendant judgment was rendered for plaintiff on the pleadings. From this judgment defendant appeals.
We see no good reason for disturbing the judgment of the court below. The claims of respondent are for water furnished the city of Oakland, and hydrants and materials used in connection with the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- San Francisco Gas Co. v. City of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Higgins v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Brown v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
- Grand Island Gas Co. v. WestNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Miller v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- City of Los Angeles v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.