Legal Opinion

Los Angeles Warehouse Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 1934No. Civ. No. 8246PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, J., pro tem.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment on an open book account for storage alleged to be due, owing and unpaid on certain automobiles stored at its request.

It was stipulated that the drivers of the twenty cars involved were arrested at the various times the machines were seized, upon charges which included in each instance the transportation of intoxicating liquor in violation of the Wright Act, and that the cars were delivered to plaintiff by the arresting officers for storage at an agreed price per month. The evidence shows that the cars were ultimately sold by plaintiff…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Sutro v. PettitCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Foxen v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Brown v. Board of Education of City of PomonaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helton v. Sisters of Mercy of St. Joseph's HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  2. City of San Jose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Hart Bros. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Town of Worland v. Odell & JohnsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Fursdon v. County of Los AngelesAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1950

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API