Legal Opinion

Nitta v. Haslam

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1934No. Civ. No. 1286PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in the sum of $20,505 for damages resulting from the death of Mikie Nitta, wife of B. G. Nitta, and mother of the other plaintiffs who were the minor children of the two. At the time of her death Mikie Nitta was of the age of thirty years, B. G. Nitta of the age of thirty-nine years, Setsuko, a daughter, of the age of four years, Masumi, a son, of the age of two years, and Satorn, a son, of the age of five months. Mikie had an expectancy of life of 35 and 33/100 years and her husband of 28 and 91/100 years.

Mikie Nitta died from injuries…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Salmon v. RathjensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Donat v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Couchman v. SnellingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Flores v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Crabbe v. RhoadesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Duprey v. ShaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Bechtold v. Bishop & Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Follansbee v. BenzenbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. Groat v. Walkup Drayage & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Fischer v. KeenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API