Legal Opinion

Flores v. Fitzgerald

California Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1928No. Docket No. S.F. 12319PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action to recover damages as a result of injuries sustained in a collision between plaintiff’s motorcycle and defendant’s automobile. The plaintiff being a minor, the action was instituted and is being prosecuted by his guardian ad litem. The jury before whom the action was tried rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, and from a judgment entered thereon the defendant has appealed.

The first contention of appellant is that respondent was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law and therefore that the trial court erred in denying appellant’s motion for a nonsuit, made at the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Coulter v. PoolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Wahlgreen v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Donat v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Anthony v. HobbieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Speck v. SarverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. McGowan v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API