Legal Opinion

Bechtold v. Bishop & Co., Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1940No. L. A. 17471PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT

These two causes, denominated the “McKinley case” and the “Bechtold case”, were consolidated prior to trial, and were heard by the court sitting without a jury. Separate findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgments were entered in favor of the respective plaintiffs, and will be considered as one document. (Union Lumber Co. v. Simon, 150 Cal. 751 [89 Pac. 1077]; Willamette etc. Co. v. College Co., 94 Cal. 229 [29 Pac. 629] ; Stanton v. Superior Court, 202 Cal. 478 [261 Pac. 1001].) An appeal has been taken by all of the defendants except John G. Baker, on the ground that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Willamette Steam Mills Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles College Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Linberg v. StantoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Winning v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Nevarov v. CaldwellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Viehweg v. ThompsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Bank of California v. ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API