Legal Opinion

Crabbe v. Rhoades

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1929No. Docket No. 6945PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, J., pro tem.

The appeal in this case is taken from a judgment on a verdict for thirty-five thousand dollars obtained in the court below as damages for personal injuries sustained by Mary F. Crabbe in a collision between two automobiles and for the resulting loss of her services to John H. Crabbe, her husband. The drivers of both colliding cars were joined as parties defendant, and negligence on the part of both was alleged. By the verdict of the jury, however, defendant Olive Gaston, driver of the ear in which Mrs. Crabbe was a guest passenger, was impliedly found free from negligence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pastene v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Scarborough v. UrgoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Carroll v. Central Counties Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Goehring v. RogersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Perez v. CrockerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Juchert v. California Water Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Hughes v. QuackenbushCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  3. Johnston v. PeairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Kohler v. StephensNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Casselman v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1940

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API