Salmon v. Rathjens
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Monroe & Cornwall, John H. Dickinson, and C. H. Wilson, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.
This is an action by two children of Moses Farmer, deceased, one of whom is a minor, for damages resulting to them from the death of said deceased, which is alleged to have been caused by the negligence of defendant. There was a jury trial resulting in a verdict for plaintiffs for forty-five hundred dollars, upon which judgment was entered. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
1. The first point made for reversal relates to.the refusal of the trial court to allow defendant to amend his answer during the progress of the trial, and its refusal…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Pierce v. ConnersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1894
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
- Usher v. West Jersey R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
- Kahn v. Triest-Rosenberg Cap Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Fuentes v. TuckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Cross v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Brown v. ColmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Jolley v. ClemensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.