Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Skelton v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1901No. L.A. No. 894PublishedCited by 41 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, Dunn & Crutcher, and George P. Adams, for Appellant.

Read the full summary

The facts are stated in the opinion. Tirey L. Ford, Attorney-General, Dunn & Crutcher, and George P. Adams, for Appellant. “ In a proceeding prosecuted by the state, of the character here inaugurated, it is sufficient to allege the ultimate fact,— namely, that the defendants are exercising the franchise without authority of law.”' (People v. Reclamation District, 121 Cal. 522; People v. Cooper, 139 Ill. 461; People v. Clayton, 4 Utah, 421; State v. Dahl, 65 Wis. 510; People v. Peoria, 166 Ill. 517.) The burden of proof and of allegation is upon the defendant, to show a full compliance with…

1Opinion of the Court

HAYNES, C.

— Quo warranto. In December, 1898, the city council of the city of Los Angeles received a written petition, under the provisions of the act of 1889 (Stats. 1889, p. 358), praying that certain territory adjacent to said city be annexed thereto and incorporated therewith, pursuant to which certain proceedings were had, which respondent claims effected the annexation of said territory. Appellant contends that these proceedings were void, and prays that the city be excluded from all corporate franchises, jurisdiction, and control within or over said territory.

A general demurrer to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Tebbe v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Russell v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. People ex rel. Attorney-General v. Dashaway Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Humboldt Cty. v. DinsmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Great Western Power Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. People v. Town of OntarioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Dunham v. ArderySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. People Ex Rel. Averna v. City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API