Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Attorney-General v. Dashaway Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1890No. 11089PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The Court.

This is an information in the nature of a quo warranto to forfeit the charter of the Dashaway Association, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the state of California, and for a judgment declaring that its property escheat to the state; that a receiver be appointed to take possession of all the property; that an injunction issue, etc.

The complaint avers that the object and purpose for which the said corporation was formed was to promote *116the cause of temperance; that it has no capital stock; that it has members who are elected under provisions of its by-laws; that…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. People v. Rensselaer & Saratoga Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Chicago Life Insurance v. NeedlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Ward v. Sea InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1838
  5. People v. Trustees of Geneva CollegeNew York Supreme Court · 1830

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Ellert v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. State ex inf. Hadley v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. Estate of TarrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Collier v. LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Brown v. Great Northern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1951

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API