Legal Opinion

Baker v. Gardner

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1989No. CV-88-0104-PRPublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

A promissory note evidencing the deferred balance of the purchase price of residential property was secured by a second deed of trust. We granted review to determine whether the note’s holder may waive the security of the deed of trust and bring an action for the entire unpaid balance. We have jurisdiction under Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3) and A.R.S. § 12-120.24.

FACTS

The Bakers sold the Gardners a single-family home for $131,000. Most of the purchase price was financed by an ICA Mortgage Corp. (ICA) loan, secured by a deed of trust. For the balance of the price,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Morrison v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Pima County v. HeinfeldArizona Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Marshall Gross v. Citimortgage, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
  3. State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Matter of MarquardtArizona Supreme Court · 1989

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API