Legal Opinion

Roseleaf Corp. v. Chierighino

California Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1963No. L. A. 27021PublishedCited by 170 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTraynor, J.

Roseleaf Corporation sold its hotel to Willy Chierighino and his family. The consideration given by the Chierighinos included a note (not involved in this action) secured by a first trust deed and chattel mortgage on the hotel and its furnishings and three notes each secured by a second trust deed on real property owned by Willy. The first trust deeds on these three parcels were owned by strangers to this action. After the sale of the hotel, those owners caused the three parcels to be sold under powers of sale contained in the first trust deeds. The second trust deeds held by Roseleaf were…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Suring State Bank v. GieseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Hatch v. Security-First National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by170 opinions

  1. Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Security Pacific National Bank v. WozabCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

165 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API