Brown v. Jensen
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiff on a promissory note.
Plaintiff was the owner of real property which, on April 26, 1950, she sold to defendants, Rose Jensen and Leota Trip*195lett. As a part of the purchase price and on the same day, defendants executed in favor of Glendale Federal Savings and Loan Association (hereafter called Federal) a note for $11,300, secured by a first trust deed on the property. At the same time, and also as a part of the purchase price, a second note was executed by them in favor of plaintiff for $7,200, secured by a second trust deed on the property. Hence…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Merced Security Savings Bank v. CasacciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Crescent Lumber Co. v. LarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Citicorp Real Estate, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.