Legal Opinion

Brown v. Jensen

California Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1953No. L. A. 22671PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment for plaintiff on a promissory note.

Plaintiff was the owner of real property which, on April 26, 1950, she sold to defendants, Rose Jensen and Leota Trip*195lett. As a part of the purchase price and on the same day, defendants executed in favor of Glendale Federal Savings and Loan Association (hereafter called Federal) a note for $11,300, secured by a first trust deed on the property. At the same time, and also as a part of the purchase price, a second note was executed by them in favor of plaintiff for $7,200, secured by a second trust deed on the property. Hence…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Merced Security Savings Bank v. CasacciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Mortgage Guarantee Co. v. SampsellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Crescent Lumber Co. v. LarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Roseleaf Corp. v. ChierighinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Freedland v. GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API