Legal Opinion

Mid Kansas Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Wichita v. Dynamic Development Corp.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1991No. CV-89-0447-PRPublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

A construction lender held notes secured by first and second deeds of trust on a residential developer’s property. The lender acquired title to the property at a trustee’s sale on the second trust deed and thereafter brought an action against the developer for the balance due on the first notes. The court of appeals held that the lender was precluded from doing so under A.R.S. § 33-814(G)1 and the rationale of our decision in Baker v. Gardner, 160 Ariz. 98, 770 P.2d 766 (1989).

We must determine whether the anti-deficiency statutes apply to a residential…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Spangler v. MemelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Barnaby v. BoardmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  3. Baker v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Paramount Insurance, Inc. v. Rayson & SmitleyNevada Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Ritchie v. Grand Canyon Scenic RidesArizona Supreme Court · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Canon School District No. 50 v. W.E.S. Construction Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Trustmark Insurance v. Bank One, Arizona, NACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Cardon v. Cotton Lane Holdings, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  5. State v. ReynoldsArizona Supreme Court · 1992

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API