Legal Opinion
State v. Klein
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 12, 1997No. Criminal 960146PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Joseph M. Klein appealed from a district court order denying Ms motion to withdraw his guilty plea and denying Ms attorney’s motion to withdraw as counsel. We conclude Klein was entitled to withdraw his plea as a matter of right; therefore, the district court erred in denying Klein’s motion to withdraw Ms guilty plea. We further conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion to withdraw as counsel.
I
[¶2] On November 29, 1994, Klein was charged with gross sexual imposition. He mitially pled not guilty, but entered mto a binding plea…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Paul A. RussellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Roberto Navarro-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- United States v. Joe SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Oswaldo CORDOVA-PEREZ, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. HarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Froistad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. FarrellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. RipleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.