Legal Opinion

Froistad v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2002No. 20010111PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice.

[¶ 1] Larry Froistad appealed from a Southwest Judicial District Court order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in denying Froistad’s petition for post-conviction relief.

I

[¶ 2] On August 7, 1998, Froistad pled guilty to murdering his daughter. He filed a motion for post-conviction relief on June 14, 2000. Froistad argued he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea for several reasons: (1) the court failed to honor his request to withdraw his guilty plea, (2) the court failed to establish a factual basis…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
  4. United States v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. Hinojosa-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. RipleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. KauliaHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Peltier v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. YostNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API