Froistad v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SANDSTROM, Justice.
[¶ 1] Larry Froistad appealed from a Southwest Judicial District Court order denying his petition for post-conviction relief. We affirm, concluding the district court did not err in denying Froistad’s petition for post-conviction relief.
I
[¶ 2] On August 7, 1998, Froistad pled guilty to murdering his daughter. He filed a motion for post-conviction relief on June 14, 2000. Froistad argued he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty plea for several reasons: (1) the court failed to honor his request to withdraw his guilty plea, (2) the court failed to establish a factual basis…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Libretti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Sydney B. Kadwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Hinojosa-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. BatesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. RipleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. KauliaHawaii Supreme Court · 2013
- Peltier v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. YostNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.