Legal Opinion

State v. Bates

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 2007No. 20060179PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Jimmie Lee Bates appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a plea of guilty, claiming the district court erred in denying his motion to withdraw the guilty plea. After considering the issues as Bates raises them, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in deny ing the motion to withdraw the guilty plea and Bates failed to establish he received ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] Bates was charged with continuous sexual abuse of a child and promoting obscenity to minors in March 2005. Prior to trial, the state’s attorney filed an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Heckelsmiller v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. HarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State v. BlurtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Moore v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. YostNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State v. FischerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Eaton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API