Legal Opinion

State v. Farrell

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 2000No. 990197PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Patrick J. Farrell appealed from a criminal judgment entered on a plea of guilty to forgery in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-24-01. Because the trial court, in accepting Farrell’s guilty plea, failed to substantially comply with the requirements of N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(c), and because the record shows Farrell did not fully understand the nature of his informal agreement for a nonbinding sentence recommendation from the State, we reverse the judgment and remand to the trial court to permit Farrell to withdraw his guilty plea.

I

[¶ 2] Farrell was charged with burglary and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Michael Joseph Paradiso and Anthony Richard Bonnacci v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  3. State v. MagnusonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. GunwallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. SchumacherNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. ErickstadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Abdi v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Sambursky v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Froistad v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API