Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul A. Russell
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided August 31, 1982No. 81-2144PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MIKVA, Circuit Judge:
The defendant, a resident alien, entered a guilty plea after negotiations with the United States Attorney. When deportation proceedings based on the resulting conviction were later initiated against the defendant, he moved under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(d) to withdraw the plea. The district court denied the motion, noting that the possibility of deportation is not a direct consequence of a guilty plea under Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. Although this is a correct statement of the law, it does not exhaust the issues raised by the defendant, and we therefore hold that the district court abused…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. Arch A. Moore, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Amos Salmon, No. 90-3355, Raymond E. Washington, No. 90-3363, Richard Fitzpatrick, No. 90-3366, John Surratt, No. 90-3438Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Jose Gonzalez, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- State v. FrancisOhio Supreme Court · 2004
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.