Legal Opinion

Sydney B. Kadwell v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 4, 1963No. 17943PublishedCited by 213 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

Appellant appeared before the District Court on a charge of violating the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. An attorney present in the courtroom was appointed to represent him. Counsel was given a copy of a proposed information and waiver of indictment, and he and appellant were “excused temporarily * * * to consult * * * about this matter.” Shortly thereafter 1 appellant appeared again before the coui’t, waived indictment, and tendered a plea of guilty. In response to the court’s questions, appellant disclaimed any promise, threat, or coercive influence, and stated that…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. United States v. WightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Charles Earl Brubaker v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  5. Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by213 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State v. PeterseimOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. State v. PhelpsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  5. United States v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API