Sydney B. Kadwell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
Appellant appeared before the District Court on a charge of violating the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C.A. § 2312. An attorney present in the courtroom was appointed to represent him. Counsel was given a copy of a proposed information and waiver of indictment, and he and appellant were “excused temporarily * * * to consult * * * about this matter.” Shortly thereafter 1 appellant appeared again before the coui’t, waived indictment, and tendered a plea of guilty. In response to the court’s questions, appellant disclaimed any promise, threat, or coercive influence, and stated that…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. WightCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Charles Earl Brubaker v. Fred R. Dickson, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin, CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by213 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. PeterseimOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
- State v. PhelpsTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.