Pacific-Southwest Trust & Savings Bank v. Valley Finance Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
The plaintiff commenced an action to recover on a promissory note. The defendant answered by interposing certain denials, by alleging a guarantee and by alleging an affirmative defense to the effect that the plaintiff was not the holder in due course and that the note sued on was an accommodation note for which the defendant received no value, and by alleging a further defense that the note was ultra vires. The action was tried before the trial court sitting without a jury. The trial court made findings of fact in favor of the defendant and the plaintiff has appealed.
As the facts are not…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Violett v. PattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- First National Bank v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Bank of Orland v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Leonard v. MinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Cottrell v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1893
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Lepori v. HilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- National City Bank v. ParrIndiana Supreme Court · 1933
- Pan-American Bank v. CrawfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932