Legal Opinion

Leonard v. Miner

California Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1898No. L. A. No. 321PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County and from an order refusing a new trial. George E. Otis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

SEARLS, C.

This action was brought April 22, 1895, by F. A. Leonard, assignee of the estate of F. A. Miner, an insolvent debtor, to set aside a conveyance from said F. A. Miner, insolvent, to Etta B. Miner, his wife, of a tract of land situate in the county of San Bernardino, upon the ground that said conveyance was made with the intent to defraud the creditors of said insolvent, F. A. Miner.

E. C. Singletary, a creditor of F. A. Miner, intervened in the action setting up the fraudulent conveyance, and praying that *404such conveyance be adjudged fraudulent and void as to intervener and other…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnes v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Jones v. ShawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  3. First National Bank of Nephi v. FooteUtah Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Erwin v. SaundersNew York Supreme Court · 1823
  5. Perry v. BigelowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1880

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. College National Bank v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Silva v. GordoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. McArthur v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Bailey v. Lankford, Bank Com'rSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API