Legal Opinion

Bank of Orland v. Harlan

California Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1922No. Sac. No. 3124PublishedCited by 25 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloane, J.

Plaintiff brought its action to recover on a promissory note executed by defendant to plaintiff, and for the conversion of a certain crop of barley covered by a mortgage assigned by defendant to plaintiff. Defendant by his answers pleaded by way of defense and for affirmative relief that the note was executed and the crop mortgage and other securities were assigned to plaintiff for a limited and temporary use, with the agreement that they would within a specified period be surrendered and returned to defendant.

The two actions were consolidated and tried before a jury, and a verdict and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cross v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Union Collection Co. v. BuckmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Kreamer v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Pacific Wharf & Storage Co. v. Standard American Dredging Co.California Supreme Court · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. RosenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. First National Bank v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Wells v. ComstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Camerer v. California Savings & Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Rosenberg v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API