Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Reed

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1926No. Docket No. S.F. 11110PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLennon, J.

This is an action brought by The First National Bank of Reedley against the defendant, E. R. Reed on two promissory notes, each bearing date May 3, 1921, one for $11,000, the other for $440. The first note for $11,000 was in renewal of a note dated November 3, 1920, executed by the defendant Reed, the second note represented the accrued interest on the original note. The defendant by his answer admitted the execution of the notes but denied that the sums set forth in said notes were due or payable by the defendant, or any part thereof. The defendant, in addition, interposed, a special defense…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Williams v. HasshagenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. McKenney v. EllsworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bank of Orland v. HarlanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Central Bank of Bingham v. StephensUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Coghlin v. MayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sands v. Eagle Oil & Refining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Meyer v. Glenmoor Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Camerer v. California Savings & Commercial BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Seth v. Lew HingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. Bank of America v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API