Legal Opinion

Violett v. Patton

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 23, 1809PublishedCited by 93 opinions

ERROR to the circuit court for the district of Columbia, sitting at Alexandria, to reverse a judgment m an action or assumpsit, brought by Patton, as enci°rsee °f a promissory note, against Violett, the endorser. The noté was made by Brooke, payable, in 30 days, at the bank of Alexandria, to the order °f Violett, arid by him endorsed to Patton. ' The declaration had two counts.

Read the full summary

ERROR to the circuit court for the district of Columbia, sitting at Alexandria, to reverse a judgment m an action or assumpsit, brought by Patton, as enci°rsee °f a promissory note, against Violett, the endorser. The noté was made by Brooke, payable, in 30 days, at the bank of Alexandria, to the order °f Violett, arid by him endorsed to Patton. ' The declaration had two counts. The first was upo'n the endorsement, and stated the making of the note by Urooke,- for value received; the assign- * 9 ^ ment by endorsement to Patton, (but did not state that the assignment was for value received,) by…

1Opinion of the Court

February 23.

Marshall, Ch. J.

delivered the opinion of the eourt as foilo.ws:

This case comes on upon two exceptions j one to the opinion of the circuit court given to the jury, and the other to the relusai of that court to give an opinion which Vvas prayedby the counsel for the defendant below.

The declaration contains two counts. One upon the endorsement of a promissory note, and the other for money had and received to the plaintiff’s use. The question , arising, on the first bill of exceptions is, whether the court erred in directing the jury respecting the liability of the defendant below, on…

2Cited by93 opinions

  1. United States v. LinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1841
  2. Angle v. North-Western Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Greenfield Savings Bank v. StowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  4. Lent v. PadelfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  5. Van Duzer v. . HoweNew York Court of Appeals · 1860

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API